resource pack
Excalibur | Modded Enchantments SupportMinecraft resource pack for 1.20.1
Excalibur support for popular Mods that add new Enchantments
- Latest version
- Excalibur Modded Enchantments Support.zip
- Minecraft
- 1.20.1
- Java
- Java 17+
- Loaders
- none declared
- Licence
- not stated
- Downloads
- 1.0M
- Updated
- 10 mo ago
- Available on
- CurseForge
Host Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support servers
One click and Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support is installed with the right loader, on hardware built for it.
- 1.20.1
- One click mod install
- Loader matched for you
- Ryzen CPUs
- NVMe SSD
Screenshots
Click a screenshot to open it. Screenshots are served from the author’s own host and belong to them.
Minecraft versions
Every version Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support declares support for, newest first, with the Java runtime that version needs.
Download
From Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
Modded Enchantments Support.zip · 0.2 MB · for 1.20.1
9afe498175e1…Frequently asked
Does Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support work on Minecraft 1.20.1?
Yes. 1.20.1 is the newest Minecraft version Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support declares support for, and the claim comes from the author's own release metadata rather than from a compatibility list somebody maintains by hand.
How do I install Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support?
Install the matching loader first, then put the downloaded file in your mods folder and start the game. The loader, the resource pack and Minecraft all have to be on the same version, which is the usual reason a mod does not appear in game.
Where do I download Excalibur | Modded Enchantments Support safely?
From the author's own page on CurseForge, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference never mirrors, re-hosts or repackages a file: every download button points at the original source, so you get exactly what the author published.
Works on the same versions
Ordered by how much of the recent Minecraft version coverage overlaps, not by popularity.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

