plugin
Combat-Tag ReloadedMinecraft plugin
Prevents Players from Combat-Tagging
- Latest version
- 1.0.12
- Minecraft
- no version declared
- Java
- follows the game
- Platforms
- none declared
- Licence
- not stated
- Downloads
- 6.5k
- Updated
- 12 y ago
- Available on
- SpigotMC
Host Combat-Tag Reloaded servers
One click and Combat-Tag Reloaded is installed on a Paper or Purpur server built for it.
- One click plugin install
- Paper and Purpur ready
- Automatic updates
- NVMe SSD
Download
From Combat-Tag Reloaded’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
combat-tag-reloaded.external
Older versions10Hide older versions
- 1.0.113 Dec 2014546 downloads
- 1.0.103 Dec 201442 downloads
- 1.0.928 Nov 2014106 downloads
- 1.0.625 Nov 201468 downloads
- 1.0.523 Nov 201460 downloads
- 1.0.422 Nov 201437 downloads
- 1.0.320 Nov 201439 downloads
- 1.0.215 Nov 201441 downloads
- 1.0.19 Nov 201440 downloads
- 1.030 Oct 201462 downloads
Frequently asked
Do I need to install Combat-Tag Reloaded on the client or the server?
The server only. Players join with an ordinary Minecraft client and install nothing.
How do I install Combat-Tag Reloaded?
Choose the release variant for your server platform. Paper, Spigot, Purpur and Bukkit files go in the server's plugins folder; Fabric, Forge, NeoForge and Quilt files go in the mods folder. Restart after installing and check that the Minecraft version matches your server.
Where do I download Combat-Tag Reloaded safely?
Start with the author's page on SpigotMC, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference does not host or repackage files. The download link goes to the source recorded for that release; verify the publisher, filename and checksum before running it.
Which Minecraft versions does Combat-Tag Reloaded work on?
The author has not declared a supported version in the metadata we sync, so there is nothing here we can state as fact. Check the project's own page before installing it, and treat an old plugin with no declared version as untested on modern Minecraft.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

