plugin
AFKZone | AFK RewardsMinecraft plugin for 1.21
Boost server engagement by rewarding AFK players
- Latest version
- 2.6.1
- Minecraft
- 1.8 to 1.21
- Java
- Java 21+
- Loader
- Spigot
- Licence
- not stated
- Downloads
- 8.7k
- Updated
- 28 d ago
- Available on
- SpigotMC
Host AFKZone | AFK Rewards servers
One click and AFKZone | AFK Rewards is installed with the right loader, on hardware built for it.
- 1.21
- Spigot
- One click plugin install
- Paper and Purpur ready
- Automatic updates
- NVMe SSD
Minecraft versions
Every version AFKZone | AFK Rewards declares support for, newest first, with the Java runtime that version needs.
| Minecraft | Through | Java | Evidence | Released |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Spigot | 21+ | declared | 13 Jun 2024 |
| 1.20.6 | Spigot | 21+ | declared | 29 Apr 2024 |
| 1.20 | Spigot | 17+ | declared | 2 Jun 2023 |
| 1.19 | Spigot | 17+ | declared | 7 Jun 2022 |
| 1.18 | Spigot | 17+ | declared | 30 Nov 2021 |
| 1.17 | Spigot | 16+ | declared | 8 Jun 2021 |
| 1.16 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 23 Jun 2020 |
| 1.15 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 9 Dec 2019 |
| 1.14 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 23 Apr 2019 |
| 1.13 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 18 Jul 2018 |
| 1.12 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 2 Jun 2017 |
| 1.11 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 14 Nov 2016 |
| 1.10 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 8 Jun 2016 |
| 1.9 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 29 Feb 2016 |
| 1.8 | Spigot | 8+ | declared | 2 Sept 2014 |
Download
From AFKZone | AFK Rewards’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
afkzone-afk-rewards-2.6.1.jar · 1.8 MB
Older versions24Hide older versions
- 2.6.028 Jun 202668 downloadsGet
- 2.5.76 Jan 20261.4k downloadsGet
- 2.5.629 Nov 2025342 downloadsGet
- 2.5.57 Nov 2025196 downloadsGet
- 2.5.48 Oct 2025240 downloadsGet
- 2.5.32 Oct 202562 downloadsGet
- 2.5.210 Sept 2025180 downloadsGet
- 2.5.124 Aug 2025217 downloadsGet
- 2.5.018 Aug 202597 downloadsGet
- 2.4.711 Aug 202591 downloadsGet
- 2.4.611 Jul 2025488 downloadsGet
- 2.4.524 May 2025626 downloadsGet
- 2.4.37 May 2025278 downloadsGet
- 2.4.12 May 2025166 downloadsGet
- 2.4.018 Apr 2025234 downloadsGet
- 2.3.311 Apr 2025180 downloadsGet
- 2.3.28 Apr 2025118 downloadsGet
- 2.3.18 Apr 202594 downloadsGet
- 2.3.03 Apr 2025106 downloadsGet
- 2.2.216 Mar 2025281 downloadsGet
- 2.2.18 Mar 2025201 downloadsGet
- 2.2.08 Mar 202586 downloadsGet
- 2.1.028 Dec 2024795 downloadsGet
- 2.0.15 Sept 2024878 downloadsGet
Frequently asked
Does AFKZone | AFK Rewards work on Minecraft 1.21?
Yes. 1.21 is the newest Minecraft version AFKZone | AFK Rewards declares support for, and the claim comes from the author's own release metadata rather than from a compatibility list somebody maintains by hand.
Which Minecraft versions does AFKZone | AFK Rewards support?
Everything the author has declared, from 1.8 up to 1.21. The full list is in the table above, with the Java runtime each version needs next to it.
Do I need to install AFKZone | AFK Rewards on the client or the server?
The server only. Players join with an ordinary Minecraft client and install nothing.
Which server software does AFKZone | AFK Rewards need?
Spigot. A build for one server platform will not load on another, so this is the first thing to check before the Minecraft version.
Which Java version do I need for AFKZone | AFK Rewards?
Java 21 or newer, because that is what the newest Minecraft release it supports requires. The requirement comes from the game rather than from the plugin itself.
How do I install AFKZone | AFK Rewards?
Download the file from the author's own release, drop it into your server's plugins folder, and restart the server. It generates its configuration on first start. Check the Minecraft version matches the one your server runs.
Where do I download AFKZone | AFK Rewards safely?
From the author's own page on SpigotMC, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference never mirrors, re-hosts or repackages a file: every download button points at the original source, so you get exactly what the author published.
Works on the same versions
Ordered by how much of the recent Minecraft version coverage overlaps, not by popularity.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

