mod
RealBenchMinecraft mod for 1.12.2
Makes vanilla workbench usable
- Latest version
- RealBench 1.3.3
- Minecraft
- 1.7.10 to 1.12.2
- Java
- Java 8+
- Loaders
- none declared
- Licence
- not stated
- Downloads
- 18.2M
- Updated
- 9 y ago
- Available on
- CurseForge
Screenshots
Click a screenshot to open it. Screenshots are served from the author’s own host and belong to them.
Minecraft versions
Every version RealBench declares support for, newest first, with the Java runtime that version needs.
Download
From RealBench’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
RealBench-1.12.2-1.3.3.jar · 0.0 MB · for 1.12.2
9a888f514200…Frequently asked
Does RealBench work on Minecraft 1.12.2?
Yes. 1.12.2 is the newest Minecraft version RealBench declares support for, and the claim comes from the author's own release metadata rather than from a compatibility list somebody maintains by hand.
Which Minecraft versions does RealBench support?
Everything the author has declared, from 1.7.10 up to 1.12.2. The full list is in the table above, with the Java runtime each version needs next to it.
Which Java version do I need for RealBench?
On the newest Minecraft release it supports, Java 8 or newer. The requirement comes from the Minecraft version you run rather than from the mod itself, so on an older supported Minecraft the answer is that version's Java, not this one.
How do I install RealBench?
Install the matching loader first, then put the downloaded file in your mods folder and start the game. The loader, the mod and Minecraft all have to be on the same version, which is the usual reason a mod does not appear in game.
Where do I download RealBench safely?
From the author's own page on CurseForge, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference never mirrors, re-hosts or repackages a file: every download button points at the original source, so you get exactly what the author published.
Works on the same versions
Ordered by how much of the recent Minecraft version coverage overlaps, not by popularity.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .
