
mod
Quark Ancient Tomes PatchMinecraft mod
Patch for Quark Ancient Tomes allows you to stack enchantments by more than +1 of the maximum level.
- Latest version
- 1.0.0
- Minecraft
- no version declared
- Java
- follows the game
- Loaders
- none declared
- Licence
- MIT
- Downloads
- 4.2k
- Updated
- 9 mo ago
- Available on
- Modrinth
Host Quark Ancient Tomes Patch servers
One click and Quark Ancient Tomes Patch is installed with the right loader, on hardware built for it.
- One click mod install
- Loader matched for you
- Ryzen CPUs
- NVMe SSD
Download
From Quark Ancient Tomes Patch’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
quark_ancient_tomes_patch-1.0.0.jar · 10 KB · for 1.20.6, 1.20.5, 1.20.4, 1.20.3, 1.20.2 +1 more
25682475b01c…Frequently asked
Do I need to install Quark Ancient Tomes Patch on the client or the server?
Both. Every player needs it installed and so does the server, so anyone joining without it will be refused.
What licence is Quark Ancient Tomes Patch under?
MIT, as stated by the author on the platform we synced it from. Check the project's own page before redistributing or bundling it.
How do I install Quark Ancient Tomes Patch?
Install the matching loader first, then put the downloaded file in your mods folder and start the game. The loader, the mod and Minecraft all have to be on the same version, which is the usual reason a mod does not appear in game.
Where do I download Quark Ancient Tomes Patch safely?
Start with the author's page on Modrinth, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference does not host or repackage files. The download link goes to the source recorded for that release; verify the publisher, filename and checksum before running it.
Which Minecraft versions does Quark Ancient Tomes Patch work on?
The author has not declared a supported version in the metadata we sync, so there is nothing here we can state as fact. Check the project's own page before installing it, and treat an old mod with no declared version as untested on modern Minecraft.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

