
mod
BuildCraft RF: ReFluxifiedMinecraft mod
An addon that makes BuildCraft machines use and produce FE/RF.
- Latest version
- 2.1.4
- Minecraft
- no version declared
- Java
- follows the game
- Loaders
- none declared
- Licence
- GPL-3.0-only
- Downloads
- 2.8k
- Updated
- 3 y ago
- Available on
- Modrinth
Host BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified servers
One click and BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified is installed with the right loader, on hardware built for it.
- One click mod install
- Loader matched for you
- Ryzen CPUs
- NVMe SSD
Download
From BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
Most recently published release
BuildCraftRF-2.1.4.jar · 27 KB · for 1.12.2 · Forge
72bac193eb8b…Frequently asked
Do I need to install BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified on the client or the server?
Both. Every player needs it installed and so does the server, so anyone joining without it will be refused.
What licence is BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified under?
GPL-3.0-only, as stated by the author on the platform we synced it from. Check the project's own page before redistributing or bundling it.
How do I install BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified?
Install the matching loader first, then put the downloaded file in your mods folder and start the game. The loader, the mod and Minecraft all have to be on the same version, which is the usual reason a mod does not appear in game.
Where do I download BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified safely?
Start with the author's page on Modrinth, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference does not host or repackage files. When available, recorded download links go to the source for that release; verify the publisher, filename and any available checksum before running it.
Which Minecraft versions does BuildCraft RF: ReFluxified work on?
The author has not declared a supported version in the metadata we sync, so there is nothing here we can state as fact. Check the project's own page before installing it, and treat an old mod with no declared version as untested on modern Minecraft.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

