
data pack
Tallest LimitsMinecraft data pack
Moves the world to the bottom limit of the data driven world size setting (y=-2032) to allow for a maximum effective build limit of 4064 blocks from the bottom of the world to the top!
- Latest version
- beta1
- Minecraft
- no version declared
- Licence
- MIT
- Downloads
- 11
- Updated
- 3 mo ago
- Available on
- Modrinth
Host Tallest Limits servers
Deploy a server with Tallest Limits already added to the world, on hardware built for it.
- One click install
- Version matched
- Automatic backups
- NVMe SSD
Download
From Tallest Limits’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
Tallest_Limits_1.21.5-8_beta1.zip · 71 KB · for 1.21.8, 1.21.7, 1.21.6, 1.21.5
f7be6ca13a60…Older versions1Hide older versions
- alpha127 Jun 20261.21.8, 1.21.7, 1.21.6, 1.21.571 KB3 downloads
ab40a9a42b95…Get
Frequently asked
Do I need to install Tallest Limits on the client or the server?
The server only. Players join with an ordinary Minecraft client and install nothing.
What licence is Tallest Limits under?
MIT, as stated by the author on the platform we synced it from. Check the project's own page before redistributing or bundling it.
How do I install Tallest Limits?
Data packs install per world: put the downloaded file in that world's datapacks folder and run /reload, or add it when creating the world. No loader is involved. On a server, the world folder lives next to the server jar.
Where do I download Tallest Limits safely?
Start with the author's page on Modrinth, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference does not host or repackage files. The download link goes to the source recorded for that release; verify the publisher, filename and checksum before running it.
Which Minecraft versions does Tallest Limits work on?
The author has not declared a supported version in the metadata we sync, so there is nothing here we can state as fact. Check the project's own page before installing it, and treat an old data pack with no declared version as untested on modern Minecraft.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

