
data pack
Better Undead HorsesMinecraft data pack
Buffs the Skeleton and Zombie Horses to be comparable to a maxed horse as well as buffing Camel Husks
- Latest version
- 1.0.2
- Minecraft
- no version declared
- Licence
- LicenseRef-All-Rights-Reserved
- Downloads
- 156
- Updated
- 8 mo ago
- Available on
- Modrinth
Host Better Undead Horses servers
Deploy a server with Better Undead Horses already added to the world, on hardware built for it.
- One click install
- Version matched
- Automatic backups
- NVMe SSD
Download
From Better Undead Horses’s own host. Nothing is re-hosted here.
better-undead-horses.zip · 0.3 MB · for 1.21.2, 1.21.3, 1.21.11
778abca2db1d…Older versions1Hide older versions
- 1.0.129 Nov 20241.21.30.3 MB95 downloads
c1577899f45e…Get
Frequently asked
Do I need to install Better Undead Horses on the client or the server?
The server only. Players join with an ordinary Minecraft client and install nothing.
What licence is Better Undead Horses under?
LicenseRef-All-Rights-Reserved, as stated by the author on the platform we synced it from. Check the project's own page before redistributing or bundling it.
How do I install Better Undead Horses?
Data packs install per world: put the downloaded file in that world's datapacks folder and run /reload, or add it when creating the world. No loader is involved. On a server, the world folder lives next to the server jar.
Where do I download Better Undead Horses safely?
Start with the author's page on Modrinth, which is where the data here is synced from. MCReference does not host or repackage files. The download link goes to the source recorded for that release; verify the publisher, filename and checksum before running it.
Which Minecraft versions does Better Undead Horses work on?
The author has not declared a supported version in the metadata we sync, so there is nothing here we can state as fact. Check the project's own page before installing it, and treat an old data pack with no declared version as untested on modern Minecraft.
Is this information wrong or missing something? .

